Science and Human Values

        This seminar probes the possibility of finding a
holistic, non-teleological, autonomous and critically rational
                        foundation for our values.

Considering

    Fact and Value
    Emotivism
    Objectivity
    Scientific Rationality
    Failure of the Enlightenment
    Trust or Mistrust of Reality
    Basis of Science and the Basis of Ethics
    Humanity: The Anthropological Constants
    Rights and Rules
    Virtue
    Scientific Understanding of the Fabric of Reality
    Trusting in the Future
    Global Ethical Problems
by examining
    The Cognitive Structure of Human Experience
    The Philosophy of Science and Critical Realism
    Post-Modern Scientific Explanations
    Philosophical Alternatives: Nietzsche or Aristotle
    Purpose, Meaning and Value
    Evolution of Responsibility
    Contrast Experiences
    The Relation of Ethics to God and Religion
SampleTexts:

After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre, Notre Dame Press, ISBN 0 268 00611 3

(The Justification of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief, Michael Banner, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ISBN 0 19 824821 0, OUT OF PRINT)

Does God Exist? Hans Kung, Crossroad, ISBN 0 8245 1119 0

The Imperative of Responsibility, Hans Jonas, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0 226 40596 6

The Fabric of Reality, David Deutsch, Allen Lane The Penguim Press, ISBN 0 713 990619

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0 226 45804 0

Glogal Responsibility:In Search of a New World Ethic, Hans Kung, Crossroad, ISBN 0-8245-1102-6

(Chance and Necessity, Jacques Monod, Vintage Press, ISBN 0 394 71825 9, OUT OF PRINT)
 

Handouts, Professional Papers on Related Material

Abstract:

The current state of the ethical dialogue is characterized by emotivism. This is a consequence
of the failure of the Enlightenment to provide a rational foundation for ethics in the absence of an accepted telos.
Can science clarify what is meant by a rational basis?  What is the alternative to Nietzsche's conclusions
after diagnosing the failure of the Enlightenment? Aristotle stresses the
primacy of virtue over rules and rights. Can a modern understanding of virtue be derived from
an analysis of the virtues from ancient to modern times? How do these considerations apply
to the global ethical questions posed by the advance of post-modern science?
 
 

This is an online discussion of the science and human values seminar. Anyone may examine the current discussion by clicking on current discussion. Students enrolled in the class may add to the current discussion by clicking on add comments.