Department of Psychology
EVALUATION OF GRADUATE STUDENT'S RESEARCH PROGRESS
BY STUDENT SPEC CHAIR OR ADVISOR
Date:
Student:
Student's SPEC Chair or Advisor:
Brief description of student's research involvement (name of research
project(s); student's role in project(s); whether projects were thesis-,
dissertation-, or course-related; and name of faculty member supervising
project):
|
|
|
Project Type |
|
|
Project Name |
Faculty
Supervisor |
(e.g., MS
Thesis) |
Student's Role |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific skills
or knowledge acquired through research involvement (e.g., laboratory
procedures, planning or design competencies, data analytic abilities,
literature familiarity):
|
|
Strengths of the student in research:
|
|
Areas of research competency in which the student should try to
strengthen, improve, or further develop:
|
|
For each of the
following items, use the following rating
5 = best possible (of unusual quality,
seldom encountered)
4 = excellent (equivalent to a grade
of "A")
3 = very good (well above average
among our students)
2 = average (most students would be
in this category)
1 = needs improvement (for most
students there is at least one category in which they would receive this
rating)
NR = not a relevant item for this
student
|
reliability |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
initiative |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
creativity |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
thoroughness |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
writing
ability |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
attention to
ethical issues |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
motivation |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
design and
data analysis |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
maturity in
judgment |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
quantity of work |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
quality of
work |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
|
OVERALL
RESEARCH EVALUATION |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
NR |
Other comments
or recommendations:
______________________________________
faculty signature