Brain and Language: LING 411/412/489, NSCI 411/611/489/689
Fall 2008

Goals: The goal of this course is to understand: how the brain is organized to produce and comprehend language, the time course of linguistic processing, and the linguistic disorders attendant on brain damage. 

CLASSROOM COMPONENT

SERVICE-LEARNING OPTION

Place and time: 12-12:50 pm, Newcomb 119

Graduate section: TBA

Place and time: You are required to work for 20 hours in a context of linguistic assessment and treatment. You must register for LING 489-10, NSCI 489-010, or NSCI 689-010.

Textbook: The textbook used in this course is Right Hemisphere Damage by Penelope Myers (Singular Publishing, 1999).

Timesheets: You are responsible for keeping track of your service hours and for getting them approved by your on-site supervisor. Your hours should be reported twice during the semester to the Center for Public Service, on the dates indicated in the schedule.

Other readings & videos: Most of the readings are pdf files of journal articles, available on the Blackboard site for the class. We will also see a video in class.

Written Reflection: You must keep a journal of your daily experiences in the clinical context, using the class’s Blackboard site. Also, from time to time you will be asked to respond to questions on the discussion board.

You should come to class having read and mulled over the readings listed for that day in the schedule. Use the texts as a resource to clarify lecture material and to deepen your own appreciation of topics of interest.

Training Session: You must attend a training session (2 hours including transport) TBA. As a courtesy to our community partners, no make-ups will be scheduled.

OBJECTIVES
For you to demonstrate your understanding of the goals of the course, you will perform the following tasks:

  1. take a quiz, during the first 10 minutes of most Monday classes, covering the material since the previous Monday. No make-up quizzes will be given, but you may drop one. (11-1 * 7% = 70%)
  2. prepare a final project, explained on a separate sheet. Graduate students are expected to put more effort into the final project. (25%)
  3. participate in an EEG experiment [undergraduates]; help run an experiment [graduates] (5%)
  1. execution of service-learning responsibilities (timesheets, etc.)
  2. the written reflection will be done as a journal on Blackboard

CONTACTS

Prof. Harry Howard

862-3417 (voice mail 24 hours a day)
Office: Newcomb Hall 322-D, MW 11-12, T4-5 & by appt
Homepage: http://www.tulane.edu/~ling/LING411/
Blackboard: syllabus, readings, grades
Facebook: friend me

Bridget Smith
Senior Program Coordinator, Campus-Community Partnerships
Tulane University's Center for Public Service
327 Gibson Hall
o: (504) 862-3322
f: (504) 862-8061
bridget1 at tulane dot edu

Code of Academic Integrity

 “The integrity of Newcomb-Tulane College is based on the absolute honesty of the entire community in all academic endeavors. As part of the Tulane University community, students have certain responsibilities regarding work that forms the basis for the evaluation of their academic achievement. Students are expected to be familiar with these responsibilities at all times. No member of the university community should tolerate any form of academic dishonesty, because the scholarly community of the university depends on the willingness of both instructors and students to uphold the Code of Academic Conduct. When a violation of the Code of Academic Conduct is observed it is the duty of every member of the academic community who has evidence of the violation to take action. Students should take steps to uphold the code by reporting any suspected offense to the instructor or the associate dean of the college. Students should under no circumstances tolerate any form of academic dishonesty.” For further information, point your browser at http://college.tulane.edu/honorcode.htm.

Violations of the Code of Academic Integrity will not be tolerated in this class. I will rigorously investigate and pursue any such transgression.

Students with disabilities who need academic accommodation should:

Schedule of assignments, Fall 2008 (preliminary)

Date

Topic

Readings & videos

ppt

mp3

Q

Service learning

Aug 27 (W)

1.     Introduction to the class

     

29 (F)

     GUSTAV          

Sept 1 (M)

     LABOR DAY

(read next week’s assignments)

       

3 (W)

     GUSTAV

(read next week’s assignments)

       

5 (F)

     GUSTAV

(read next week’s assignments)

     

 

8 (M)

2.     Introduction to the brain; How we know what we know

Osterhout et al. (2006)

   

10 (W)

3.     Visual cognition

Norman (2002:73-96), Palmeri & Gauthier (2004)

   

12 (F)

4.     Visual object categorization, category-specific deficits, agnosia

Grill-Spector (2004), Bright et al. (2005)

   

15 (M)

5.     Visual object categorization & ERP

Proverbio et al. (2007)

Q1

 

17 (W)

6.     Reading & dyslexia

Dien (2008)
   

19 (F)

7.     Auditory cognition

Kubovy & Van Valkenburg (2001), Arnott et al. (2004)

 

Orientations

22 (M)

8.     Speech perception

Hickok & Poeppel (2004)

Q2

"

24 (W)

9.     Phonetics & phonology

various webpages
 
"

26 (F)

10.  Phonetics & phonology

some of Indefrey & Levelt (2004)

 
"

29 (M)

11.  Auditory deficits

Polster & Rose (1998)

[sorry, dead batteries!]

Q3

 

Oct  1 (W)

12. Lateralization of phonology

Myers §4
   

3 (F)

13. Lateralization of phonology 2

Myers §4
   

6 (M)

14. Lateralization of phonology 3

Myers §4

Q4

 

8 (W)

15. Lateralization of word semantics Myers §5
   

10 (F)

16.  Lateralization of word semantics 2

Myers §5
 

Turn in timesheets

13 (M)

17.  Wernicke’s aphasia

 
Q5
 

15 (W)

18.  Wernicke’s aphasia 2

 

 

 

17 (F)

19.  Transcortical sensory aphasia

relevant parts of Indefrey & Levelt (2004); Boatman et al. (2000)

   

20 (M)

20.  Transcortical motor aphasia, Mixed transcortical aphasia, Conduction aphasia

Hickok (2000), Catani, et al. (2005)
Q6
 

22 (W)

21. Broca’s aphasia

 

 

 

24 (F)

22.  Global aphasia, anomia, apraxia, dysarthria

 

[recording failed - some kind of problem]
   

27 (M)

23. Right hemisphere discourse deficits

Myers §6

Q7
 

29 (W)

24. Right hemisphere discourse deficits

Myers §6

 

 

31 (F)

25. Right hemisphere discourse deficits Myers §6, 8
   

Nov  3 (M)

26. Referential vs. modalizing speech

Nespolous et al. (1998)

Q8
 

5 (W)

27. Hemispheric differences in reasoning Parsons & Osherson (2001)

 

 

7 (F)

28. Reasoning & text comprehension

Friese et al. (2008)
   

10 (M)

29.  Introduction to EEG & ERP

 

Q9
 

12 (W)

30.  The Linguistic ERPs & N1/N100

 

 

 

14 (F)

31. Mismatch negativity (MMN)

 
   

17 (M)

32.  ELAN

 
Q10
 

19 (W)

33.  LAN

 
[see next one]
[cancelled]

 

 

21 (F)

34. N400

 
   

24 (M)

35.  P600

 
   

23 (W)

THANKSGIVING BREAK

         

26 (F)

THANKSGIVING BREAK

         

Dec 1 (M)

36.  P600, cont.

 

   

3 (W)

37.  Williams vs. Downs

Bellugi et  al. article

Q11
 

5 (F)

38.  Bloody video, course evaluations

     

 

Turn in timesheets

15 (M)

39.  FINAL EXAM day, 8-12

Oral presentations

two samples:  
   

Go back to Harry Howard's home page

Current version 08/27/08; Last change 3-dec-08.