Professor Kevin F. Gotham
Sociology: 220 Newcomb Hall
Office Hours: 2:30-5:00, Fridays.
Phone: 862-3014
Phone: 862-3004
Email: kgotham@tulane.edu
Course Description
Sociology 322 is designed as an introductory survey of social theory.
The majority of the course will focus on "classical" or modern social theory,
in particular, the pioneering work of Karl Marx (1818-1883), Max Weber (1864-1920),
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), and Georg Simmel (1858-1918). We focus on these
four theorists because they represent four very different approaches to understanding
the transition from traditional to modern society, the nature of urbanization
and industrialization, capitalism and social organization, and democracy
and individuality. We will examine the theories of Marx, Weber, Durkheim,
and Simmel not just as intellectual history, but as sources of unique and
powerful systems of thought that continue to have a major impact on understanding
the contemporary world. In the last five weeks of the course we will focus
on contemporary social theory. We will cover the work of the Chicago School
sociologists, structural-functionalism, symbolic interactionism, contemporary
neo-Marxian theories, and contemporary theories of modernity.
Course Objectives
The objectives of this course are to present an overview of sociological
theory in the historical context of its development, illustrate the links
between theory and research, and foster a critical understanding of society.
This means developing the ability to approach the social world in a deeper
and more systematic way, using empirical evidence and logical assumptions
in order to answer questions of sociological interest. Social theory is
the backbone of the sociology discipline and all major substantive questions
of sociological interest are directly related to theory. We will examine
different meanings and definitions of theory, how theories are evaluated,
and how we can build on past and existing theories to build new ones to investigate
society. We will also seek to understand how theories are shaped by the
historical context in which they are produced.
Originally, sociology was founded as a self-conscious attempt to understand
the changes that swept across western Europe and eventually the rest of the
world from 1500 onward. Modern Society or "Modernity," as theorized by sociologists
and other scholars is a historical periodizing term that refers to the epoch
that follows the 'Middle Ages' or feudalism. Modernity is associated with
the rise of industrial capitalism, the dominance of bureaucratic systems
of authority, and new forms of social solidarity and cohesion, and the dominance
of the money economy and the modern metropolis. For the classical sociologists,
modern life is a distinctive mode of experience that takes place within a
landscape of powerful nation-states, sophisticated mass communication and
transportation technologies, changing forms of production and consumption,
spectacular wealth and prosperity, and appalling waste and devastation.
On the one hand, modern society offers immense possibilities for economic
growth, abundance, and human creativity. Extraordinary achievements and
innovations in agricultural production, health care delivery, and transportation
offer hope that human needs will be satisfied and miseries overcome. On
the other hand, modern society is a society of chaos and turbulence, a perpetual
clash of conflicting groups and mass social movements, and a world marked
by destruction and devastation on an unparalleled scale. "To be modern,"
as social theorist Marshall Berman notes, "is to find ourselves in an environment
that promises adventure, joy, growth, transformation of ourselves and the
world - and, at the same time, that threatens to destroy everything we have,
everything we know, everything we are."(1)
In the nineteenth century, modern life developed within a landscape of
capitalist economic activity, steam engines, industrial factories, rapid
urbanization, bureaucratized nation-states, and new forms of mass media (e.g.,
telegraphs and telephones). Marx, Durkheim, Weber, and Simmel experienced
modernity as a whole at a moment when only a small part of the world (e.g.,
Europe and the United States) was truly modern. Over the course of the twentieth
century, the processes of modernization have cast a net that no one, not
even in the remotest corner of the world can escape. Today, modern life
is "globalized" such that the entire world is dominated by automobiles, radio
and television, computers, air and space travel, satellite communication,
bureaucratic organizations, and multinational aggregations of capital. Modern
society is both revolutionary and conservative, homogeneous and diverse,
alive to new possibilities for experience and adventure but marked by a dizzying
pace of change and upheaval. The miseries and mysteries of modern life,
its ambiguities and ironies, its immense variety and richness, its progressive
and emancipatory capacities are the subject matter of modern social theory.
What is distinctive about sociology is its attempt to provide coherent
and scientific explanations of historical change and social order, to connect
the present with a past and a future, and to help men and women understand
their lives in a constantly changing world, where as Marx says, "everything
is pregnant with its contradictory," and "all that is sold melts into air."
One of the virtues of social theory is that it can help you connect your
life with the lives of millions of people who are living through the trauma
and excitement of modernization thousands of miles away, in societies radically
different from our own, and with millions of people who lived through it
a century or more ago. Another advantage of studying social theory is that
it can help you cultivate and develop a "sociological imagination." C. Wright
Mills referred to the sociological imagination as the quality of mind necessary
to grasp the relationship between individual biography, social structure,
and human history. It is the mission of sociology, according to Mills, to
help individuals achieve "lucid summations" of what is going on in the world
and what is happening in their own lives. Developing a sociological imagination
requires background in social theory.
My goal in this course is to get you to understand how important theory
is to sociology. Without theory, we have no possibility of understanding
what goes on around us. Without theory, we have no guide to decide what
to study about society. Without theory, we cannot create any critical understanding
of what is society and what might lead to progressive social change. Indeed,
to construct a sociological theory requires figuring out a number of things.
What is society? What are its components and levels of organization? What
role do individuals play? How do we study society? What is social theory
and what is it good for? Can we use our analysis of society to create a
more just and better society?
Required Readings
Tucker, Robert (editor). 1978. Marx-Engels Reader. Second Edition.
W.W. Norton and Company.
Bellah, Robert N. (editor). 1973. Emile Durkheim: On Morality and
Society. Selected Writings. University of Chicago Press.
Gerth, H. H., and C. Wright Mills (editors and translators). 1972.
From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.
Kivisto, Peter. 2000. Social Theory: Roots and Branches. Roxbury
Publishing Company.
Ritzer, George. 2000. Sociological Theory. Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill Company.
Course Expectations and Requirements
This course will generally follow a lecture format. The purpose of lectures
is to provide necessary background material (e.g., historical, biographical,
and conceptual), exegesis of the original texts, as well as commentary and
critique. Readings are to be completed prior to each class meeting for which
they are assigned. The readings are extensive, complex, sophisticated, and
will require many hours of hard work and effort.
Class Participation
Everyone is encouraged to participate through open discussion and questions,
including sharing thoughts and ideas, observations, and assessments during
class time. Thoughtful and active participation means attending class regularly
and being prepared to discuss the assigned subject matter. In line with
that, I ask you to be mindful that education is not a process whereby a professor
dumps a bunch of information into the heads of passive receivers (students).
Learning is a collaborative process whereby information and knowledge is
to be shared between the professor and students. Please do not be worried
about asking "dumb questions." If you are confused, chances are there are
numerous other people who are also befuddled and will welcome your efforts
at clarification.
Attendance and Cell Phone Policy
I require students to attend all classes and will take roll at the beginning
of each class period. Be aware that just because I do not take attendance
does not mean that I have overlooked absent students. Four or more
unexcused absences will result in the lowering of your final grade by one
letter grade. An unexcused absence is missing class without the
professor's permission or without presenting a valid excuse within twenty-four
hours. All students are required to attend all classes unless they are ill
or prevented from attending by exceptional circumstances. Preparedness, attendance
and participation are expected and will have a bearing on final grades. Be
on time to class and do not bring your cell phones. Anybody who has ever
spoken in front a group knows that it can be very confusing for a speaker
when people wander in and out or when phones ring. I always try to treat
students with courtesy and respect. It makes life easier for all of us when
you reciprocate.
Tests and Papers
Your grade for this course will be determined by your performance on two
test and two papers (8-10 pages each), attendance, and my evaluation of your
participation in class. Each of the two tests will contain a combination
of fill-in-the-blank and short-answer questions, and two or more essay questions.
Each exam will be worth 50 points. There will be no true/false questions.
The comprehensive final exam will cover all assigned readings, handouts,
regular lectures, in-class discussions, and all other class activities, from
the first day to the last day of the course.
In each of the two (8-10 page) papers, you may be asked to compare and
contrast the way in which two different theories explain a given phenomenon.
You may also be asked to connect the work of one or more classical theorist
to some current event(s). Another typical assignment could be to consider
the strengths and weaknesses of a contemporary theory in relation to a major
concern of the classical theorists. All papers are to be typed, double-spaced,
with one inch margins, and page numbers in the top right hand corner. You
will have one week to write each paper. Papers will be graded on a scale
of A, A-, B+, B, B-,C+, C, C-, D+, D, and D-. One letter grade will be deducted
for each day the paper is late. You are to hand in two copies of
each paper. You will turn in one copy of the paper with a "Social
Theory Paper Evaluation" (see last page of syllabus). The evaluation sheet
should be attached to the back of the paper.
Group Discussions
Finally, ten percent of your grade will be based on my evaluation of your
participation in class and five group discussions where each group will do
a textual analysis of a classical treatise and turn in an outline at the
end of class. A textual analysis explains what the author's main points are,
how they are connected, and offers a critique of the author's argument. The
class will be divided into 6-7 groups composed of 5-6 people. The membership
of these groups will be in alphabetical order and will remain the same throughout
the semester. On the specified Fridays, we will break into groups and each
group will analyze a major chapter or series of chapters from the readings.
Everyone is required to read the assigned chapter(s) before we meet on Fridays
and break into groups (I would recommend that each student put together a
brief outline on the chapter(s) before meeting on Fridays). Each group will
discuss the reading, ask questions about the text, and identify the main
points. At the end of the Friday discussion each group will turn in a written
outline that provides a brief summary, critical analysis, and evaluation
of the classical text using the following format:
1. Summary. Provide a brief summary outline of what the author
is saying. Identify the central questions, main points, and core arguments.
Rather than analyzing all the ideas that the author presents, you should
focus in depth on one or two significant aspects of the text. Keep in mind
that the summaries are not as easy as they seem. A good summary of a chapter
requires an awareness and knowledge of the author's style of thinking, not
just the particular facts that are presented to support an argument.
2. Analysis. Analysis involves going beyond what the author says.
It means examining relationships between evidence and conclusions, between
concepts in the text, and relationships between concepts in the work being
analyzed and other texts. Moreover, analysis means identifying and clearly
explaining the devices the author uses to convince the reader that he or she
is correct. These devices can include logical reasoning (i.e., if/then statements),
anecdotes (stories used to illustrate a point), appeals to authority, controlled
study, and rhetorical virtuosity (skill at using language: big scientific
words, humor, satire, irony, or nostalgia). What is important is that you
understand what the author is doing, to be able to analyze the devices being
used.
3. Evaluation. How well does the author answer his or her question and verify that answer? This is the realm of criticism and it assumes that you cannot really judge a text until you comprehend what the author is doing and how he or she does it. Evaluation involves answering the following questions:
A. What is the argument of the text?
B. What are the implicit assumptions of the author's argument? Identifying and evaluating an author's assumptions are two intellectual skills most often demanded in sociological theory classes. All authors make assumptions about the way the world works.
C. What are the conclusions and implications of the author's work? How do they connect with other readings?
D. Is the craftsmanship of the writing sound? Do the parts fit into a
whole? Is the prose understandable? Do the ideas flow smoothly from one to
another?
Mastering the skill of textual analysis will help you write better papers
and, more important, help you evaluate more clearly all books and articles
you encounter in your academic career and beyond. Each unexcused
absence for the Friday discussions will result in the lowering of your participation
grade by one letter grade. On the last day of class you will fill
out a confidential evaluation of each member in your group. This evaluation
will ask you to evaluate the intellectual contribution, and courteousness
and respectfulness of each member of your group.
Course Grades:
Test #1 (Friday, 1/31) 22.5% of final grade.
Paper #1 (Friday, 2/28) 22.5% of final grade.
Paper #2 (Friday, 3/28) 22.5% of final grade.
Comprehensive Final Exam (Friday, 4/25) 22.5% of final grade.
Class Participation and Friday Discussion/Analysis Outline (5) 10% of
final grade.
I do not give extra credit, extra assignments, nor other opportunities
for improving grades. Moreover, I do not negotiate about grades, except
when you believe there is an explicit error in the grading procedures. No
grades will be determined by a curve. Finally, I do not like the informal
and impersonal nature of email. You may not ask me questions about the course
over email (or by phone). If you have questions, please make an appointment
and come talk with me.
Honor Code
All students are required to abide by the Tulane University Honor Code.
This means that "the presence of a student's name on any work submitted
in completion of an academic assignment is considered to be an assurance
that the work and ideas are the result of the student's own intellectual
effort, stated in her or his own words, and produced independently, unless
clear and explicit acknowledgment of the sources for the work and ideas is
included. This principle applies to papers, tests, homework assignments,
artistic productions, laboratory reports, computer programs, and other assignments"
(Tulane Undergraduate Catalog 1999-2001, p. 15).
Week 1-2: Introduction and Background.
1/8 (Wednesday), 1/10 (Friday), and 1/13 (Monday).
CLASSICAL SOCIAL THEORY
Week 2-4: Karl Marx.
1/15 (Wednesday). Introduction to Karl Marx.
1/17 (Friday). Analysis of Capitalism.
1/20 (Monday). NO CLASS. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DAY.
1/22 (Wednesday). Alienated Labor.
1/24 (Friday). Introduction to the Materialist Conception of History. Read the following from the Tucker book for Group Discussion #1:
1/27 (Monday). Materialist Conception of History and the Theory of Ideology.
1/29 (Wednesday). Commodities, Commodification, and Fetishism.
1/31 (Friday). EXAM #1.
Last Day to Drop without Record: Feb. 7 (Friday).
Week 5-7: Max Weber.
2/3 (Monday). Introduction to Max Weber.
2/5 (Wednesday) - 2/7 (Friday). Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
2/10 (Monday). What is Sociology?
2/12 (Wednesday). Class, Status, and Party.
2/14 (Friday). Domination, Legitimacy, and Authority.
2/17 (Monday) - 2/21 (Friday). Rationalization and Bureaucracy.
2/21 (Friday). Group Discussion #2. HAND OUT FIRST THEORY PAPER TOPIC.
Papers due on Friday 2/28.
Week 8-9: Emile Durkheim.
2/24 (Monday). Introduction to Emile Durkheim.
2/26 (Wednesday). What is Sociology?
2/28 (Friday). Mechanical Solidarity, Organic Solidarity, and the Division of Labor in Society.
MARDI GRAS BREAK. 3/3 (Monday) - 3/7 (Friday).
3/10 (Monday). Analysis of Suicide.
3/12 (Wednesday) - 3/14 (Friday). Sociology of Religion.
3/14 (Friday). Group Discussion #3.
Week 10: Georg Simmel.
3/17 (Monday). Introduction to Georg Simmel.
3/19 (Wednesday) - 3/21 (Friday). What is Sociology?
3/21 (Friday). Group discussion #4. HANDOUT SECOND THEORY PAPER TOPIC.
Papers due on Friday, 3/28.
CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL THEORY
Week 11: The Chicago School and Structural Functionalism.
3/24 (Monday).
3/26 (Wednesday).
3/28 (Friday).
Week 12: Symbolic Interactionism.
3/31(Monday) - 4/4 (Friday).
Week 13: Contemporary Neo-Marxian Theory.
4/7 (Monday) - 4/11 (Friday).
Week 14-15: Contemporary Theories of Modernity.
4/14 (Monday) - 4/23 (Wednesday).
4/18 (Friday). NO CLASS. SPRING BREAK.
Recommended Reading:
4/23 (Wednesday). Summary, Review, Evaluations.
4/25 (Friday). COMPREHENSIVE FINAL EXAM.
Soc. 322. Social Theory.
Professor Gotham.
Tulane University.
How to Read the Texts.(2)
The required texts for this semester are not easy to read. You cannot
begin to understand what the authors are saying if you think that you can
read the texts like a newspaper or magazine. You must locate a distraction-free
environment (far away from the TV, radio, and other interruptions) and set
aside a large block of time each day to read. The selections are often long
and we are going to cover an enormous amount of material in a very short
period of time. As such, I suggest that you start early and keep ahead of
the readings. Come to class with questions about the readings. If you do
not understand something then ask about it.
My main goal is to introduce you to social theory. I want you to understand
the political, economic, and socio-cultural context surrounding the rise
and development of social theory. This will help you make sense of what
is social theory, what are the basic components of theory, and why social
theory is important. I have included readings that show how different theorists
developed their theories and analyzed societies in general. I have also
included readings that highlight how various theorists conceive of premodern
and modern society. Finally, I include readings that bear on the question
of how society can be made a better place.
When you read the selections, I would like you to think about four issues:
1. What is the author's argument
2. How does this argument fit in with their general theory?
3. Does the argument and theory make sense?
4. How could you use this theory to explain happenings in today's society and in your own life?
Consider these other questions:
1. With whom is the author arguing?
2. What is the position the author is arguing for?
3. What role does the selection you are reading play in the author's overall theory?
4. What is society according to the author?
5. What is the author's conception of the individual (e.g, what motivates individuals to act, what is the relationship between the individual and social structure, norms, interests, ideas, ideologies)?
6. What is the author's conception of social structure?
7. What is premodernity? What is modernity?
8. What is power? Who has power? How is power exercised?
9. What is the role of the economy, the state, and ideas in the maintenance
of society?
Name:
Paper #_____. Question #_____.
Paper grade: _____.
Analysis and Criticism:
POOR EXCELLENT
1 2 3 4 5 Thoughtfulness and organization of essay (e.g., is the essay well conceived and thought out or does it have a rushed and superficial quality to it).
1 2 3 4 5 Follows the directions of the assignment (e.g., answers questions sufficiently).
1 2 3 4 5 Coherence of explanation. Clear statements. Succinct.
1 2 3 4 5 Key terms and concepts are defined and explained.
1 2 3 4 5 Assertions and arguments supported with specific cites to the original works.
1 2 3 4 5 Assertions and arguments supported with specific quotes from the original works.
1 2 3 4 5 Depth of coverage of existing literature and original works.
Technical presentation:
X denotes that attention should be paid to this problem.
XX denotes that extra attention is warranted.
_____ Late paper (one letter grade is deducted for each day the paper is late).
_____ Paper format: pages numbered in top right hand corner, one inch margins, double-spaced.
_____ Appropriate citation format not followed.
_____Text is too long or too short.
_____ Redundancy (wordy; can be trimmed without loss of meaning).
_____ Some statements are unsupported (e.g., undeveloped and/or vague statements).
_____ Insufficient coverage of existing literature.
_____ Insufficient depth of coverage.
_____ Typographic errors, misspelled words, punctuation errors.
_____ Incomplete sentences, awkward sentence structure.
_____ Some paragraphs are too long or too short.
Name:
Paper #_____. Question #_____.
Paper grade: _____.
Analysis and Criticism:
POOR EXCELLENT
1 2 3 4 5 Thoughtfulness and organization of essay (e.g., is the essay well conceived and thought out or does it have a rushed and superficial quality to it).
1 2 3 4 5 Follows the directions of the assignment (e.g., answers questions sufficiently).
1 2 3 4 5 Coherence of explanation. Clear statements. Succinct.
1 2 3 4 5 Key terms and concepts are defined and explained.
1 2 3 4 5 Assertions and arguments supported with specific cites to the original works.
1 2 3 4 5 Assertions and arguments supported with specific quotes from the original works.
1 2 3 4 5 Depth of coverage of existing literature and original works.
Technical presentation:
X denotes that attention should be paid to this problem.
XX denotes that extra attention is warranted.
_____ Late paper (one letter grade is deducted for each day the paper is late).
_____ Paper format: pages numbered in top right hand corner, one inch margins, double-spaced.
_____ Appropriate citation format not followed.
_____Text is too long or too short.
_____ Redundancy (wordy; can be trimmed without loss of meaning).
_____ Some statements are unsupported (e.g., undeveloped and/or vague statements).
_____ Insufficient coverage of existing literature.
_____ Insufficient depth of coverage.
_____ Typographic errors, misspelled words, punctuation errors.
_____ Incomplete sentences, awkward sentence structure.
_____ Some paragraphs are too long or too short.
1. Berman, Marshall. 1988. All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. Second Edition. New York: Penguin Books. (Quote appears on page 15).
2. This page is adapted from Fligstein, Neil. Sociology 201. Sociological Theory. Syllabus.