Newcomb-Tulane College: Behavior and Code of Academic Conduct
Academic Year 2008-2009
98
iv. False Information
Furnishing false information to any University official, instructor, or
Tulane University office relating to any academic assignment or issue.
v.
Unauthorized collaboration
Collaboration not explicitly allowed by the instructor to obtain credit
for examinations or course assignments.
vi. Multiple submission
Presentation of a paper or other work for credit in two distinct courses
without prior approval by both instructors.
vii. Sabotage
Destroying or damaging another student's work, or otherwise
preventing such work from receiving fair graded assessment.
viii. Unfair advantage
Any behavior disallowed by an instructor that gives an advantage over
other fellow students in an academic exercise.
ix. Facilitation of academic dishonesty
Knowingly helping or attempting to help another student violate any
provision of the code.
x.
Tampering with academic records
Misrepresenting, tampering with, or attempting to tamper with any
portion of a student's academic record.
xi. Improper disclosure
Failure of an honor board member or participant in an honor board
hearing to maintain strict confidentiality concerning the identity of
students accused of Code of Academic Conduct violations.
ARTICLE IV: RESPONSIBILITIES
Instructors
All instructors shall foster an environment which encourages adherence to the
principles of honesty and integrity. Each instructor shall give specific directions
concerning the nature of examinations and assignments, stating, for example,
when collaboration is permissible.
Each instructor shall be familiar with the principles and procedures of the Code.
He or she shall report all suspected violations so that, for example, repeat
offenders can be detected. Each instructor shall also appear and testify when
called upon by the honor board.