Return to Conference Summary


 

William Cross, Jr.,

The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY)

 

ABSTRACT

 

In 1951, two psychiatrists, Abraham Kardiner and Lionel Ovesey, published what at the time was thought to be a state-of-the-art psychological investigation of the identity and personality of the Negro.  They concluded that middle-class and poor blacks alike suffered from a Negro-self-hatred” syndrome that likely had its origins in the aftermath of the slavery experience.  They called this legacy of slavery the “mark of oppression.”  With the unfolding of the Civil Rights and Black Power Movements of the 1950s and 1960s, scholars renewed interest in the study of slavery, and by the late 1970s, the “mark of oppression” thesis had fallen out of favor.  It is now understood that over the course of nearly 400 years of bondage, the captive Africans were able to exploit various gaps and contradictions in the way the slavery system operated, resulting in a level of humanity and cultural strengths never intended by slave owners.  Blacks exited from slavery with healthy personality profiles and keen cultural competencies that allowed them to navigate continued experiences with oppression from 1865 to the late 1950s.  Over the last 30 years, this legacy of strength has met its match in black nihilism, stemming from the massive and protracted unemployment of black workers.  That black and white observers alike have seen in this nihilism a “legacy of slavery” constitutes a form of intellectual denial, regarding the psychological consequences of economic redundancy in the 1990s.  In today’s world, the employment links to the larger society have been severed completely for tens of thousands of blacks, and the resulting nadir may prove to be as grim a challenge as that faced by blacks, after slavery or during the Depression of the 1930s.

Back to top