| Prof. Stephen A. Nelson | EENS 111 |
| Tulane University | Physical Geology |
Global Tectonics |
|
|
|
| Plate Tectonics is a theory developed in the late 1960s, to explain how the outer
layers of the Earth move and deform. The theory has caused a revolution in the way we
think about the Earth. Since the development of the theory, geologists
have had to reexamine almost every aspect of Geology. Plate tectonics has proven to be so
useful that it can predict geologic events and explain almost all aspects of what we see
on the Earth. Although we have discussed plate tectonics throughout the course, in this
lecture we look at how the theory came to be discovered and some of its implications for the evolution of the Earth. Tectonic Theories Tectonic theories attempt to explain why mountains, earthquakes, and volcanoes occur where they do, the ages of deformational events, and the ages and shapes of continents and ocean basins.
Alfred Wegner was a German Meteorologist in the early 1900s who studied ancient climates. Like most people, the jigsaw puzzle appearance of the Atlantic continental margins caught his attention. He put together the evidence of ancient glaciations and the distribution of fossil to formulate a theory that the continents have moved over the surface of the Earth, sometimes forming large supercontinents and other times forming separate continental masses. He proposed that prior to about 200 million years ago all of the continents formed one large land mass that he called Pangea (see figure 20.1 in your text). The weakness of Wegner's theory, and the reason it was not readily accepted by geologists was that he proposed that the continents slide over ocean floor. Geophysicists disagreed, stating the ocean floor did not have enough strength to hold the continents and too much frictional resistance would be encountered. In 1950s and 1960s, studies of the Earth's magnetic field and how it varied through time (paleomagnetism) provided new evidence that would prove that the continents do indeed drift. In order to understand these developments, we must first discuss the Earth's magnetic field and the study of Paleomagnetism. The Earth's Magnetic Field and Paleomagnetism |
| The Earth has a magnetic field that causes a compass needle to always point toward the North magnetic pole, currently located near the rotation pole. The Earth's magnetic field is what would be expected if there were a large bar magnet located at the center of the Earth (we now know that this is not what causes the magnetic field, but the analogy is still good). The magnetic field is composed of lines of force as shown in the diagram here. | ![]() |
| A compass needle or a magnetic weight suspended from a string, points along these lines of force. Note that the lines of force intersect the surface of the Earth at various angles that depend on position on the Earth's surface. This angle is called the magnetic inclination. The inclination is 0o at the magnetic equator and 90o at the magnetic poles. Thus, by measuring the inclination and the angle to the magnetic pole, one can tell position on the Earth relative to the magnetic poles. |
| In the 1950s it was discovered that when magnetic minerals cool below a temperature called the Curie Temperature, domains within the magnetic mineral take on an orientation parallel to any external magnetic field present at the time they cooled below this temperature. | ![]() |
| At temperatures above the Curie Temperature, permanent magnetization of materials is not possible. Since the magnetic minerals take on the orientation of the magnetic field present during cooling, we can determine the orientation of the magnetic field present at the time the rock containing the mineral cooled below the Curie Temperature, and thus, be able to determine the position of the magnetic pole at that time. This made possible the study of Paleomagnetism (the history of the Earth's magnetic field). Magnetite is the most common magnetic mineral in the Earth's crust and has a Curie Temperature of 580oC |
| Initial studies of the how the position of the Earth's magnetic pole varied with time were conducted in Europe. These studies showed that the magnetic pole had apparently moved through time. When similar measurements were made on rocks of various ages in North America, however, a different path of the magnetic pole was found. | ![]() |
|
This either suggested that (1) the Earth has had more than one magnetic pole at various times in the past (not likely), or (2) that the different continents have moved relative to each other over time. Studies of ancient pole positions for other continents confirmed the latter hypothesis, and seemed to confirm the theory of Continental Drift.
Sea-Floor Spreading During World War II, geologists employed by the military carried out studies of the sea floor, a part of the Earth that had received little scientific study. The purpose of these studies was to understand the topography of the sea floor to find hiding places for both Allied and enemy submarines. The topographic studies involved measuring the depth to the sea floor. These studies revealed the presence of two important topographic features of the ocean floor:
Another type of study involved towing a magnetometer (for measuring magnetic materials) behind ships to detect submarines. The records from the magnetometers, however, revealed that there were magnetic anomalies on the sea floor, with magnetic high areas running along the oceanic ridges, and parallel bands of alternating high and low magnetism on either side of the oceanic ridges. Before these features can be understood, we need to first discuss another development in the field of Paleomagnetism - the discovery of reversals of the Earth's magnetic field and the magnetic time scale (covered in Chapter 11).
|
|
|
| Vine, Matthews, and Morely put this information together with the bands of magnetic stripes on the sea floor and postulated that the bands represents oppositely polarized rocks on either side of the oceanic ridges, and that new oceanic crust and lithosphere was created at the oceanic ridge by eruption and intrusion of magma. As this magma cooled it took on the magnetism of the magnetic field at the time. When the polarity of the field changed new crust and lithosphere created at the ridge would take on the different polarity. This hypothesis led to the theory of sea floor spreading. | ![]() |
| If new oceanic crust and lithosphere is continually being created at the
oceanic ridges, the oceans should be expanding indefinitely, unless there were a mechanism
to destroy the oceanic lithosphere. Benioff zones and the oceanic trenches provided the
answer: Oceanic lithosphere returns to the mantle by sliding downward at the oceanic
trenches (subducting). Because oceanic lithosphere is cold and brittle, it fractures as it
descends back into the mantle. As it fractures it produces earthquakes that get
progressively deeper.
|
|
Plate Tectonics By combining the sea floor spreading theory with continental drift and information on global seismicity, the new theory of Plate Tectonics became a coherent theory to explain crustal movements. Plates are composed of lithosphere, about 100 km thick, that "float" on the ductile asthenosphere. |
![]() |
|
While the continents do indeed appear to drift, they do so only because they are part of larger plates that float and move horizontally on the upper mantle asthenosphere. The plates behave as rigid bodies with some ability to flex, but deformation occurs mainly along the boundaries between plates. |
|
|
|
| Types of Plate Boundaries
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Hot Spots and Absolute Plate Velocities
Plate velocities determined from the rate of sea floor spreading or by making measurements across a plate boundary are only relative velocities. That is we know the velocity of one plate only if we can assume that the adjacent plate is not moving. In order to determine absolute plate velocities, we need some fixed reference point that we know is not moving. |
| One place where this might be possible is in the Pacific Ocean, where the Hawaiian Islands are part of a chain of islands, far removed from any plate boundary, where islands and seamounts in the chain increase in age from the southeast to the northwest (see figure 2.20 [Chapter 2] in your text). Furthermore, the island at the southeast end of the chain, the Big Island of Hawaii, is the only island with currently active volcanoes. The island chain appears to have formed as the Pacific plate moved over a Hot Spot, an area in the Earth's mantle where hot material from the Earth's interior is moving upward. If we can assume that such a hot spot is stationary, then we can calculate the absolute velocity of the Pacific Plate as it has moved over the hot spot. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Other hot spots have been recognized beneath the Earth's surface based on similar reasoning (see figure 2.22 [Chapter 2] in your text). By using these hot spots to determine absolute velocities, we find that the African Plate is almost stationary (expected because the African Plate is surrounded by oceanic ridges, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is moving toward the west. Furthermore, the Atlantic Ocean is getting bigger and the Pacific Ocean is getting smaller. |
|
Cause of Plate Tectonics From seismic wave velocities we know that the asthenosphere behaves in ductile manner, that is even though it is solid it can flow under stress and behave like a liquid. If this is the case, then it can also convect. Recall that convection is a mode of heat transfer wherein the heat moves with the material. Convection is caused when material that occurs at a deeper level is heated to the point where it expands and becomes less dense than the material above it. When this occurs, the hot less dense material rises. In a confined space, rising hot material will eventually cool and become denser than its surroundings. This cool dense material must then sink. This gives rise to convection cells, with hot rising currents and cool descending currents. If the asthenosphere is in fact moving as a result of convection, then convection could be the mechanism responsible for plate tectonics. Hot rising currents would occur beneath oceanic ridges.
|
|
|
| Magma intruding
into the ridge would push lithosphere apart at the ridge. As the new lithosphere cools, it
will slide off the topographic high that results from the upwelling of the mantle and will
eventually become cold and dense. This dense lithosphere will tend to pull the rest of the
lithosphere downward. A combination of dragging the lithosphere along the top of the
convection cell, ridge push, sliding, and slab pull all appear to be contributing factors
to the cause of plate tectonics.
Plate Tectonics and Continental Crust The continents can be
divided into two kinds of structural units |
The observation that the orogens are generally younger towards the outside of any
continent suggests that the continents were built by collisions of plates that added
younger material to the outside edges of the continents, and is further evidence that
plate tectonics has operated for at least the last 2 billion years. Because continents can
join by collision and can split by rifting, we need to examine the various types of
continental margins that can occur and see how they relate to plate boundaries. |
|
![]() |
|
Areas where rifting may be forming future passive continental margins include the Red Sea area of northern Africa, the East African Rift Valley, and the Basin and Range Province of the Western U.S. Block fault mountains are common in the initial stages of rifting. |
|
|
|
Subduction of the oceanic lithosphere beneath the continental lithosphere produces continental volcanic arcs that erupt mostly andesitic magma. Sediments along the margin are deformed into mélanges and a pair of metamorphic belts develops beneath the continental margin, the one closest to the plate margin shows blueschist facies metamorphism and the one beneath the volcanic arc shows greenschist and amphibolite facies metamorphism. |
![]() |
|
When such paired metamorphic belts are observed in ancient rocks, this provides evidence that the area was once a convergent continental margin. The best example of a current convergent continental margin occurs along the Pacific coast of South America and in the Cascade Mountains of the western U.S. |
|
![]() |
|
The Himalayas resulted from a collision of the plate containing India with the plate containing Eurasia. This collision is still taking place and results in joining the two formerly separate plates. The occurrence of ancient fold -thrust mountain belts such as the Appalachian Mountains of the Eastern U.S., the Urals of Central Russia, and the Alps of southern Europe, are evidence of ancient continental collision margins. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|