| EENS 204 | Natural Disasters |
| Tulane University | Prof. Stephen A. Nelson |
|
Slope Stability, Triggering Events, Mass Wasting Events |
|
Factors that Influence Slope Stability |
| Gravity The main force responsible for mass wasting is gravity. Gravity is the force that acts everywhere on the Earth's surface, pulling everything in a direction toward the center of the Earth. On a flat surface the force of gravity acts downward. So long as the material remains on the flat surface it will not move under the force of gravity. On a slope, the force of gravity can be resolved into two components: a component acting perpendicular to the slope and a component acting tangential to the slope. |
![]() |
|
|
Fs = Shear Strength/Shear Stress
|
| The Role of Water Although water is not always directly involved as the transporting medium in mass-wasting processes, it does play an important role. Think about building a sand castle on the beach. If the sand is totally dry, it is impossible to build a pile of sand with a steep face like a castle wall. If the sand is somewhat wet, however, one can build a vertical wall. If the sand is too wet, then it flows like a fluid and cannot remain in position as a wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Another aspect of water that affects slope stability is fluid pressure. In some
cases fluid pressure can build in such a way that water can support the weight of the
overlying rock mass. When this occurs, friction is reduced, and thus the shear
strength holding the material on the slope is also reduced, resulting in slope failure.
|
Troublesome Earth Materials
|
|
This can occur as a result of ground shaking, as we discussed during our exploration of
earthquakes, or can occur as water is added as a result of heavy rainfall or melting of
ice or snow. It can also occur gradually by slow infiltration of water into loose
sediments and soils. |
![]() |
The amount of water necessary to transform the sediment or soil from a solid mass into a liquid mass varies with the type of material. Clay bearing sediments in general require more water because water is first absorbed onto the clay minerals, making them even more solid-like, then further water is needed to lift the individual grains away from each other. |
|
|
Another material that shows similar swelling and compaction as a result of addition or
removal of water is peat. Peat is organic-rich material accumulated in the bottoms
of swamps as decaying vegetable matter. |
|
|
|
![]() |
But this may cause a loss in shear strength of the soil and result in slippage down
slope or liquefaction. This is referred to as remolding.
Clays that are subject to remolding are called quick clays. |
|
Some clays, called thixotropic clays, when left undisturbed can strengthen, but when disturbed they loose their shear strength. |
| Triggering Events A mass-wasting event can occur any time a slope becomes unstable. Sometimes, as in the case of creep or solifluction, the slope is unstable all of the time and the process is continuous. But other times, triggering events can occur that cause a sudden instability to occur.
|
|
The upper clay layers were relatively stiff, but the lower layers consisted of a sensitive clay, as discussed above. The slide moved about 610 m toward the ocean, breaking up into a series of blocks. It began at the sea cliffs on the ocean after about 1.5 minutes of shaking caused by the earthquake, when the lower clay layer became liquefied. As the slide moved into the ocean, clays were extruded from the toe of the slide. The blocks rotating near the front of the slide, eventually sealed off the sensitive clay layer preventing further extrusion. This led to pull-apart basins being formed near the rear of the slide and the oozing upward of the sensitive clays into the space created by the extension. |
![]() |
75 homes on the top of the slide were destroyed by the movement of the mass of material toward the ocean. |
|
Nevados de Huascarán is a high peak in the Peruvian Andes Mountains. The peak consists of granite with nearly vertical joints (fractures) covered by glacial ice. On January 10, 1962 a huge slab of rock and glacial ice suddenly fell, with no apparent triggering mechanism. This initiated a debris flow that moved rapidly into the valley below and killed 4,000 people in the town of Ranrahirca, but stopped when it reached the hill called Cerro de Aira, and did not reach the larger population center of Yungay. |
On May 31, 1970 a magnitude 7.7 earthquake occurred on the subduction zone 135 km away from the Nevados de Huascarán. |
![]() |
|
Shaking in the area lasted for 45 seconds, and during this shaking another large block of the Nevados de Huascarán between 5,500 and 6,400 meters elevation fell from the peak. |
This time it became a debris avalanche sliding across the snow covered glacier and moving down slope at velocities up to 335 km/hr. The avalanche then hit a small hill composed of glacially deposited sediment and was launched into the air as an airborne debris avalanche. From this airborne debris, blocks the size of large houses fell on real houses for another 4 km. The mass then recombined in the vicinity of Cerro de Aira and continued flowing as a debris flow, burying the town of Yungay and its 18,000 residents. |
|
|
The debris flow reached the valley of the Rio Santa and climbed up the
valley walls killing another 600 people on the opposite side of the river.
Since
then, the valley has been repopulated, and currently large cracks are seen on the remains
of the glacier that still covers the upper slopes of Nevados de Huascarán. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Falling rocks were frequent in the quarry and their were almost continuous loud noises heard coming from the overhang above the quarry. Realizing that the slope had become unstable, the miners stopped working, thinking that the rock mass above the quarry would probably fall down. |
![]() |
On September 11, 1881 the 10 million m3 mass of rock above the quarry
suddenly fell. But, it did not stop when it hit the quarry floor. Instead, it
broke into pieces and rebounded into the air. Residents in Untertal, on the opposite
side of the valley from the slide, saw the mass of rebounded rock coming at the them and
ran uphill. But the mass of rock continued up the walls of the valley and buried them. The
avalanche then turned and ran an additional 2,230 m as a dry avalanche traveling at 180
km/hr burying the village of Elm. The avalanche killed 115 people. |
|
|
|
The rocks are mostly limestones, but some are intricately interbedded with sands and clays. These sand and clay layers form bedding planes that parallel the syncline structure, dipping steeply into the valley from both sides. |
|
|
Fracture systems in the rocks run parallel to the bedding planes and perpendicular to bedding planes. The latter fractures had formed as a result of glacial erosion which had relieved pressure on the rocks that had formed deeper in the Earth. |
![]() |
Some of the limestone units have caverns that have been dissolved in the rock due to
chemical weathering by groundwater. Furthermore, the dam site was built near an old
fault system. During August and September, 1963, heavy rains drenched the area adding
weight to the rocks above the dam. On October 9, 1963 at 10:41 P.M. the south wall of the
valley failed and slid into the reservoir behind the dam. The slide mass was 1.8 km
long and 1.6 km wide with a volume of 240 million m3. As the slide moved
into the reservoir it displaced the water, forcing it 240 meters above the dam and into
the village of Casso on the northern side of the valley. Subsequent waves
swept
up to 100 meters above the dam. Although the dam did not fail, the water rushing over the
dam swept into the villages of Longorone and T. Vaiont, killing 2,000 people. Waves
also swept up the reservoir where they first bounced off the northern shore, then back
toward the Pineda Peninsula, and then back up the valley slamming into San Martino and
killing another 1000 people. The debris slide had moved along the clay layers
that parallel the bedding planes in the northern wall of the valley. A combination of
factors was responsible for the slide. First filling of the reservoir had increased
fluid pressure in the pore spaces and fractures of the rock. Second, the heavy rains
had also increased fluid pressure and also increased the weight of the rock above the
slide surface. After the slide event, parts of the reservoir were filled up to 250 m
above the former water level, and even though the dam did not fail, it became totally
useless. This event is often referred to as the world's worst dam disaster. |
|
In this area the rocks have been folded into a synclinal structure with rock layers dipping gently toward the Pacific Ocean. |
![]() |
Rocks near the surface consist of volcanic ash that has been altered by chemical weathering to an expanding type clay called bentonite. Below these altered ash layers are shales that are interbedded with other thin volcanic ash layers that have been similarly altered to bentonite clay. The area had the appearance of an earth flow, with a very hummocky topography with many enclosed basins filled with lakes. Prior to the 1950s the area had been used for farming. In the 1950s demand for ocean views led to the development of the area as an upscale suburb. But, no sewer system was available, so wastes were put into the ground via septic tanks. In 1956 the area began moving down slope toward the ocean. Rates of movement were fastest several months after the end of the winter rainy season and slowest during the summer dry season. In the next three years the earthflow moved as much as 20 meters, but in the processes the expensive homes built on the flow became uninhabitable. Movement was caused by a combination of wave erosion along the coast removing some the mass resisting flow, added water due to the disposal of wastes, watering of lawns, and rainfall causing the bentonite clays to expand and weaken, and by the added weight of development on top of the flow. Property owners looked desperately for someone to sue, and eventually won a suit against the county of Los Angeles who had added fill dirt to build a road into the development (note that since the property owners could not sue themselves, nor could they sue the clay layers responsible for the movement they found the only agency with deep pockets that was available). |
|
|
|
| Assessing and Mitigating Mass-Wasting Hazards As we have seen mass-wasting events can be extremely hazardous and result in extensive loss of life and property. But, in most cases, areas that are prone to such hazards can be recognized with some geologic knowledge, slopes can be stabilized or avoided, and warning systems can be put in place that can minimize such hazards.
If we look at the case histories of mass-wasting disasters discussed above, in all
cases looking at the event in hindsight shows us that conditions were present that should
have told us that a hazardous condition existed prior to the event. Because there is usually evidence in the form of distinctive deposits and geologic structures left by recent mass wasting events, it is possible, if resources are available, to construct maps of all areas prone to possible mass-wasting hazards. Planners can use such hazards maps to make decisions about land use policies in such areas or, as will be discussed below, steps can be taken to stabilize slopes to attempt to prevent a disaster. Short-term prediction of mass-wasting events is somewhat more problematical. For earthquake triggered events, the same problems that are inherent in earthquake prediction are present. Slope destabilization and undercutting triggered events require the constant attention of those undertaking or observing the slopes, many of whom are not educated in the problems inherent in such processes. Mass-wasting hazards from volcanic eruptions can be predicted with the same degree of certainty that volcanic eruptions can be predicted, but again, the threat has to be realized and warnings need to be heeded. Hydrologic conditions such as heavy precipitation can be forecast with some certainty, and warnings can be issued to areas that might be susceptible to mass-wasting processes caused by such conditions. Still, it is difficult of know exactly which hill slope of the millions that exist will be vulnerable to an event triggered by heavy rainfall.
All slopes are susceptible to mass-wasting hazards if a triggering
event occurs. Thus, all slopes should be assessed for potential mass-wasting
hazards. Mass-wasting events can sometimes be avoided by employing engineering techniques
to make the slope more stable. Among them are: Some slopes, however, cannot be stabilized. In these cases, humans should avoid these areas or use them for purposes that will not increase susceptibility of lives or property to mass-wasting hazards. |